The readings for module 1 gave me mixed feelings about the
use of technology in education. Since before I began my graduate
program with NAU-Extended Campuses, I have been fascinated in the field of higher
education and distance learning. My undergraduate experience was very
traditional in the sense that all my courses were in person and never required online work (this was from 2004-08). Taking online courses has definitely been a challenge, but
I've been able to see a positive side to the increase in distance education due to the shifts in higher education that we are seeing
today.
I was already familiar with the content in Howell et al.'s
article on the 32 trends affecting distance education because I had used it
before as reference for a class paper. The trends I find most interesting are
the enrollment trends and the change in student demographics, such as older
adults and adults working full time. I used to be opposed to for-profit
institutions like the University of Phoenix or other proprietary schools
because of their recruitment practices and high costs, but as I've learned more
about HE and online education I have realized they are simply meeting a demand
for higher education that cannot be met my traditional institutions. For that
reason I also applaud traditional institutions like NAU for realizing the
demand for higher education and creating the extended campuses and online
programs for those who cannot physically access the Flagstaff campus.
As I read the articles on the use of social networking sites
by universities and faculty, I began to see reluctance on my part to accept
these types of changes in higher education. Although it is a new concept that
has not been explored much, I do not think creating a sense of classroom
community through the use of social networking would make any significant
changes in learning. Hung and Yuen’s article demonstrated that students still
do not believe faculty-student interactions via SNS’s are appropriate. Students still feel as their privacy is being invaded if a professor were to use SNS's to contact them or learn more about them (Teclehaimanot & Hickman, 2011). Personally, I like to keep my professional (school and work) and personal (friends and family) lives separate so having a faculty or school administrator interact with me on Facebook would be uncomfortable and would lead me to set stricter privacy measures. Just as some employers judge potential employees by their SNS profiles, I think faculty could use information learned through SNS's to judge a student.
Lastly, as much as I tried to understand the logic behind
the use of mobile digital devices in education, I could not see it being an
adequate tool in K-12 education. The main argument behind the use of mobile devices
in 21st century education is that children are already tech savvy
and could be learning how to use the tools more efficiently, since today’s
workforce now depends strongly on technology. As much as I tried to understand
the rationale for children to be using mobile devices for school, I feel like
all the problems associated with their use (distractions, access, filters,
appropriateness of content, and measurability of learning) outweigh the gains
claimed to come from using mobile technology in learning. Colleges using SMS to
help student transition into higher education “during periods of vulnerability”
is a little different than using mobile
technology for learning because the mobile media is being used as a social tool,
rather than an instructional tool (Jones, Edwards & Reid, 2009). In their study, Jones at al. found that students do see SMS communication between themselves and instructors on class relevant topics to be useful and gives them a sense that the instructor cares about their success in the class (p. 209-210). I do see a good use to the applicability of mobile technology in education, but I do not agree that it should be imposed on students for the sake of innovation.
All in all, I feel like an old person because of my reluctance to embrace the use of certain technologies in education. I feel like young people already spend too much time connected via technology rather than interacting face to face. In the case of distance education, this lack of face to face interaction is inevitable and the use of technology is very justified, but to have to impose online learning or to completely change an educational system that still relies heavily on real people to transmit knowledge doesn't seem right.
No comments:
Post a Comment